Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Bill Maher on Religion

Sunday, August 16th, 2009

I’m opinion-less in the religion debate. Most major religious beliefs can’t be explicitly proven or disproven.

Politically, I’ve been leaning increasingly more libertarian, perhaps more so than a lot of self-identified libertarians.

No matter where you stand on either the religious or political spectrum, you’ve got to admit that Bill Maher makes some great arguments (and jokes) on the topic of religion, particularly how it is led and used by politics today.

This isn’t meant as an indictment of personal belief or faith, but the abuse of religion in our culture is also undeniable.

Play games on Logan Frederick

Economics of the Candidates

Wednesday, September 10th, 2008


It’s time to cut through the crap. There hasn’t been enough publicly written that rebuffs the blatantly liberal bias of the internet and media and isn’t purchased by the conservative corporations. With only two parties able to win the presidency, the options are solidly placed on separate sides of the political spectrum with no truly beneficial middle ground.

In order to inform the uneducated or undecided, I will be starting on my first series of blog posts titled “Economics of the Candidates”. Every other day until the end of the series, I will examine the following policies for both parties:

  • Taxes
  • Business Regulation
  • Housing
  • Alternative Energy
  • Health-Care
  • Trade
  • Economic Advisors
  • War

While no one is truly without bias, I will present the facts and analyze how they will actually act in office with some of my own editorializing. What should come of this examination is a broad, encompassing guide to the platforms of both major US Presidential candidates.

*Note: Congress, the real legislative powers, will be addressed in future posts, but have thus far been pretty passive, so they’re a slight non-issue for now.

**Note: To reveal my own bias before we begin this series, I’m currently leaning 60% McCain, 40% Obama for various reasons that I will explain after this feature is finished. If only Ron Paul hadn’t tried to return to the gold standard and abolish the Reserve, we might’ve had a libertarian candidate we could vote for, but alas, we’re stuck with the same tired parties.

Play games on Logan Frederick

US Government Bails Out Top Two Mortgage Giants and Brief Comments on the Housing Fiasco

Saturday, September 6th, 2008

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are the two largest mortgage companies in America with their roots stemming back to the Great Depression when FDR formed them as part of his New Deal to handle the majority of America’s mortgages and mortgage repackaging. Ever since, these two government-sponsored institutions have monopolized the mortgage market. This means easy money when people are buying homes.

And it means a colossal public failure when the economy spirals out of control.

In January, the combined companies were valued at approximately $60 billion. Yesterday, they stood at $10 billion. Today, little is left except some pocket change.

A government bailout is more humble and face-saving than a bankruptcy. It also implies that the government sees the business as too vital to fail. However, these events will force some $5 trillion in guaranteed mortgage securities held banks and funds (China’s central bank alone holds $340 billion in mortgage-backed securities) around the world to be the responsibility of the government. This “conservatorship” agreement could force taxpayers to support any losses related to collapsed mortgages from Freddie and Fannie.

(more…)

Play games on Logan Frederick

McCain Taps Female For VP

Friday, August 29th, 2008


Whoever wrote CNN’s headline “McCain taps Alaska Gov. Palin as vice president pick” has a dirty sense of humor that I applaud.

Governor Palin has been in office for two years, a degree in Communications/Journalism (so I’m betting she’s great at PR handling), and has a decently pretty face for 44.

Pregnancy rumors and bothersome ex-brother-in-laws aside, the discussion should be over how she’s going to influence the McCain campaign going forward.

All things considered, I’m going to say quite well. At least, I don’t see her doing any harm.

A quick analysis has to address the obvious reason she was chosen: to seduce women voters over to the Republican camp. You know, all those Clintonites who were spurned by the Obama mob. I can see her influence having various effects: She could represent a kinder, younger, more energetic alternative to Clinton, something women may find appealing, or she’ll be considered ditsy and inexperienced. That sounds bad, but it’s not as though McCain had those supporters to begin with, so it’s kinda a nothing to lose shot.

The alternative, picking a man, really wouldn’t have covered any fresh ground for McCain: he’s already old and experienced, yet more moderate than many Republicans and he didn’t need to hardcore support he fought for in the primaries anymore. They certainly aren’t leaving for Obama.

In essence, Palin might be the perfect compliment to McCain: young, vibrant, probably better at PR, attracts a completely separate demographic, but shares values with the candidate and party. Is she the best thing for the country? Probably not, as vibrance doesn’t solely mean you’re ready to step into the Presidency. Her political views will soon be revealed and her ability to convert from the Democratic party could die off well before the election. But for a running mate, I don’t think McCain could ask for more.

**UPDATE** To those who believe this is a “desperate plea for love” from McCain, to you I say: Well, yeah, but he has to, the guy is a tad dopey and not all that compelling except the to World War 2 crowd. I expected someone, well, likable to be his Vice President.

**UPDATE 2** Additionally, for a couple of people who feel she was a “random” pick, I told quite a few people beforehand that it was going to be a Governor we hadn’t heard of and weren’t going to be able to predict. None of the obvious candidates fit the bill of what the McCain camp needed.

Play games on Logan Frederick

Experience + Change

Monday, August 25th, 2008

This Friday night was my second night sleeping in my dorm. I, like many other Americans, was awoken at 3am from a sound sleep (or, as sound as possible in a concrete rectangle with no air conditioning) by a text message alert from the Obama Campaign making good on their promise to text all who wished to be notified as soon as a vice president was chosen. As I focused my vision on the small screen in the wee hours of the morning I read this:

“Barack has chosen Senator Joe Biden to be our VP nominee. Watch the first Obama-Biden rally live at 3pm ET on www.BarackObama.com. Spread the word!”

Immediately after reading this, I uttered one word: “shit.” Why would Obama chose Joe Biden? The man who (knowingly or unknowingly) passed into the world one of the most notable and racially charged gaffs of the campaign: “I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy”. (What was he trying to say?) This was the first (and only) morsel of my knowledge that came to mind at 3am. I stared at the springs supporting the bunk above mine as I pondered the move and went back to sleep. Waking up a few hours later, I checked my phone again to make sure I hadn’t dreamed the experience. I read once again, Barack Obama has chosen Joe Biden as his vice presidential nominee. Shit. Then it all dawned on me: Biden was truly Obama’s only choice. Biden provides a perfect counterweight to the Obama’s flaws as articulated by the McCain camp. To the claim that Obama is inexperienced, Biden is a senior senator to even John McCain. To the claim that Obama has no foreign policy, Biden is the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations committee. To the claim that Obama’s speeches have no substance, Biden is plain spoken and colloquial. To the claims that Obama is too liberal, Biden will attract the more moderate to conservative democrats. Even to the classical qualification of choosing a vice president (geographically balancing the ticket) Biden comes through–almost. (Although not bringing a geographically balance of the North Carolinian John Edwards, Delaware would still bring more of a balance than, say, a certain other senator from New York.)

Almost exactly 12 hours after making the text message notification, Obama and Biden made consecutive speeches in Springfield, Illinois. Obama spoke of Biden’s strong suits and did not once mention McCain, while Biden split time between speaking highly of Obama and tying the failures of the Bush administration and John McCain, while still calling McCain “a friend.”

Now it’s McCain’s turn to choose a Vice President. My call would be former mayor and failed presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani. Giuliani would almost certainly deliver some votes from former democratic stronghold New York, and hold the more moderate to liberal republicans that may have previously fled to Obama/Biden.

But, as politics (as well as life) always proves–there are no sure bets.

Play games on Logan Frederick

MLKing a Legacy

Thursday, August 7th, 2008

Oh the trials and tribulations of fanatical conservatism. First it was the Ku Klux Klan terrorizing blacks, Catholics, immigrants, and Jews because apparently Jesus favored white Protestant Americans–even though Jesus was a Jewish middle-easterner whose home fry Peter set up the Catholic church–but those are just details. Fast forward about 150 years and allow me to call your attention to a group calling themselves the National Black Republican Association and their mantra: Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican. Recently, I saw a picture of a Youtube ad that contained this and other “facts” all aimed at a black audience by the national black republican association. I was always sure that Dr. King was (for the most part) left leaning but apolitical, looking beyond party politics to an agenda of  acceptance and well being of all people. Being a politically minded black liberal democrat, I visited the NBRA website to look for more information on the topic. A quick look around the website will reveal to anyone two things. Number one: these guys are as sketchy as a comic book. Number two: Half-truths and misleading information is blatant propaganda to try and divorce black voters from the Democratic Party and liberal principles.

So like Paul Harvey, I’ll tell you the rest of the story:

- Ronald Regan was a former Democrat.

- A Democrat (Scoop Jackson) is considered the father of Neo-conservatism

- The Democrat (Strom Thurmond) who filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1957 turned to the Republican party in 1964 and even after he changed to a more lax position on race relations, he defended his earliest segregationist views until his death in 2003.

And on a side note of the above point, I would also like to mention that it was former Republican senator Trent Lott who said in 2002 that if Strom Thurmond won the presidential race in the south in 1948, “we wouldn’t have all these problems over the years”. Now, to be fair, the States’ Rights Democratic Party (the Dixiecrats) ran on more than just a segregationist platform–but the National Socialist German Workers’ Party ran more then just a platform of antisemitism, but we all know how that turned out.

On another side note I would like to point out that after making these remarks, Trent Lott attained the rank of “Minority Whip” in the Senate. That’s just one of those happy little coincidences in life that proves the existence of a God with a sense of humor.

- Robert Byrd, the Democratic member of the House of Representatives that is the NBRA’s poster boy for racism in the DNC was a member of the KKK in the 1940s, but later fully recanted and apologized for his views, and today speaks against the Klan.

- Barry Goldwater (nicknamed Mr. Conservative) when running for (and eventually receiving) the Republican nomination in 1964 had the full support of the KKK to the extent that members marched outside of the Republican Convention in San Francisco holding Goldwater signs.

And of course, to refute the initial claim that Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican. Here are direct quotes from the man himself:

-“You can’t talk about solving the economic problem of the Negro without talking about billions of dollars. You can’t talk about ending the slums without first saying profit must be taken out of slums. You’re really tampering and getting on dangerous ground because you are messing with folk then. You are messing with captains of industry… Now this means that we are treading in difficult water, because it really means that we are saying that something is wrong…with capitalism… There must be a better distribution of wealth and maybe America must move toward a Democratic Socialism.”– speech to his staff in 1966.

Now, I am by no means saying that my party has historically been and will always be the correct one (the National Black Republican Association is riding that horse already). I have many bones to pick with the democratic party–in fact I consider myself a liberal first and a democrat second. Also, I have nothing against conservatism or republicans. What I take issue with is presenting a small scope of facts that will not hold up under a degree of scrutiny. But hey, it worked for Dylan Avery.

Play games on Logan Frederick

America, the champion of the free world…. 50 years ago.

Monday, August 4th, 2008

Americans consider themselves to be the epitome of everything great. We seem to think that we’re the flag bearers of Western civilization, and that the world would be much better off if everyone would just hop on board with us. Now, I’m not saying that Americans are terrible, or that we’re a bad country, but in reality, we aren’t always as good as we claim to be.

To begin with, while most of the western parts of the world (and including in countries like Pakistan, a very conservative Islamic nation) have had a woman executive, Americans seem to think that it will somehow change everything once we have our first, and almost think that the rest of the world really thinks that its that big of a deal. Well heads up, they don’t really care.

America is quite possibly the farthest behind in social issues in the entire developed western world. We champion human rights, criticize other countries for their records, yet completely disregard the fact that we are a very sexist and racist country, (SPOILER ALERT: Yes! We are racist!!!) and this irony isn’t lost on the rest of the world. Even China, notorious for its terrible human rights history has stood up and said that our history of racial violence and slavery leave us in no true position to criticize anybody.
(more…)

Play games on Logan Frederick

MobLogic TV

Saturday, June 21st, 2008

CBS’s content is questionable at times. Two and a Half Men, like most sitcoms, reuses the same storylines for nearly every episode and is one of the greatest sitcoms I’ve seen solely because Charlie Sheen is indisputably the greatest actor of all time. Why? Because he plays himself in every role.

This post isn’t about Two and a Half Men though. CBS has been branching out from its roots to mix two types of media: television and the Internet. Youtube’s success inspired tons of web video startups, CBS being no exception.

I now introduce you to MobLogic TV, a political show started by CBS that asks the public for their opinion on major modern issues, as well as investigates the truth behind events.

What I really appreciate about this venture is that CBS isn’t really mass-marketing. MobLogic feels homegrown, like a production team is making the shows without corporate influence and are deciding on when and how they’d like to cover topics, many of which you would never hear from more mainstream media.

Beware of a slightly Democratic spin on things. This is probably due to the nature of Republican’s to be more content with the current situation of the nation. Any show this question-heavy would end up slanted toward Democrats asking Republicans about the state of things, and I’m hoping that it will question Obama’s office equally when he is inducted. There are episodes where both parties are equally represented.

Now your first episode introductory episode of MobLogic:

And a second episode that’ll give you a clearer picture of what the show is about:

I’ll be including MobLogic videos in my posts occasionally, partly because I really like the show and and partly because I want CBS to sponsor me.

Play games on Logan Frederick